compare

How Stride compares.

The field is either rev-share-with-humans or flat-fee-but-AI-shallow-and-single-tenant. Two columns come back empty for everyone else: a per-client agent, and cross-network Signals.

platformpricingrev-share / skimwhite-labelmulti-coach + podsai depthper-client agentnetwork signalsreal community
StrideFlat + per-seat0% / 0%
ABC TrainerizePer-client~5% skim◐◐◐––◐
LenusRevenue-share~30% rev◐◐◐––◐
EverfitPer-clientStripe◐◐◐––◐
TrueCoachPer-client~5% skim–◐––––
KahunasFlatStripe◐◐––◐
FitFocusFlat0% fee◐–––◐
StridistPer-coachStripe◐–––◐

✓ real/strong · ◐ partial/shallow · – none. As of June 2026; rev-share & skim figures are reported/typical and move — verify at point of sale.

vs the 30% incumbent

Keep your revenue

The managed incumbent reportedly takes ~30% of everything you earn to fund a human services team — ~$25k/mo on a $1M brand. Stride is flat and replaces that team with AI.

vs the 5%-skim tools

Keep your 5%

The big per-client tools now skim ~5% of every client payment — often more than the software itself. Stride takes 0% and never caps you on client count.

vs the flat, no-AI rival

Same economics, a decade ahead

Our closest rival matches the premium-flat, true-white-label, 0%-fee promise — but ships no AI at all. Stride is the AI-native version of the exact thing that buyer already wants.

Same economics. A decade ahead on the product.

See the instrument live — 30 minutes, your roster on screen.